INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT

September 7, 2013

In a recent blog post on the National Council for Research on Women, Dr. Laura Briggs asserts that the feminist attorneys who sided with the adoptive father in the Baby Veronica case were misguided.  I disagree with Dr. Briggs’ assertion[1] that feminists are “on the wrong side” of the Adoptive Couple vs. Baby Girl case. The amicus brief Dr. Briggs cited, by Joan Hollinger and Elizabeth Bartholet, made the legal case that an “unwed mother with sole custody of her children should have a due process right to make decisions concerning her children”[2].  They noted that, in most states, a biological link between unwed father and child doesn’t define a parent.  Instead, an actual relationship between father and child is required.  Those ideas make sense, and, in fact, The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) thought so, too. [3]

Here’s why the Supreme Court’s ruling is good for women:

  1. The Baby Veronica SCOTUS ruling improved biological parents’ abilities to choose adoptive placements for their child.
  2. The Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA)[4] has the unintended consequence of harming Native American children.  The best interest of the child should be paramount in every custody case every time.
  3. The ruling also made it less likely that a parent can change his or her mind late in the adoption proceedings and claim a child she or he had previously relinquished.

The facts of the case

But first, let’s review the facts of the case.   Christinna Maldonado, a non-native (and part Hispanic) single mother of two became pregnant by her fiancé, Dusten Brown.  However, she ended the relationship while she was pregnant.  Ms. Maldonado asked for support for the baby, but Brown demanded that she marry him, or he would not pay support.  She declined.  They communicated via text, and she asked him if he would rather pay child support or relinquish his rights.  He decided to relinquish his rights and did so legally.  Maldonado identified a South Carolina couple, Matt and Melanie Capobianco, and an open adoption resulted.  After Veronica had been with her adoptive parents four months, Brown changed his mind and decided he wanted to raise his daughter.

Court battles in SC ensued, and eventually the court ruled that two year-old Veronica must be turned over to her biological father, Dusten Brown.  On December 31, 2011, SC adoptive parents Matt and Melanie Capobianco handed 27-month old Veronica to Brown, and they continued their litigation.   The SC Supreme Court ruled that he was not considered a parent because he didn’t attempt to take responsibility for his biological daughter until she was four months old.  Even so, because of the ICWA’s additional protections to Native American peoples, Brown would maintain custody of Veronica.

Subsequently, however, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled that ICWA did not apply to Dusten Brown because he had never had custody and was therefore not an existing Indian family.

SCOTUS remanded the case to the Supreme Court of South Carolina, which directed the Family Court to immediately finalize the Capobiancos’ adoption of Veronica[5].  The Family Court finalized the adoption on July 31, 2013, approving a week-long transition plan for Veronica to make the transition as smooth as possible.  However, Brown did not show up for the transition plan and made clear that he would not turn Veronica over, despite being arrested for Custodial Interference.

The Law of Unintended Consequences

The Baby Veronica case revealed two tragedies of the unintended consequences of ICWA.  In this case, the law gave a shirking dad more rights than a biological mother.  Second, despite aiming to help Indian children, ICWA unintentionally harms many children. [6] [7]

Parents should be able to choose adoptive placements for their children and native children should have the same rights as non-native children.   However, under the ICWA, Native American children have fewer rights.

Put this in personal terms.  If you had a child to be placed for adoption, and the father was uninvolved, you would want to choose the parents of your child.  You would have that right… but ONLY IF you created that child with someone whose lineage couldn’t be traced back to certain Native American people.  If the biological father were Indian, even if not involved in a tribe or enrolled in a tribe, the tribe can step in and determine “best interest” for your child.

More shocking is that even if both parents (Indian or not) chose and agreed upon an adoptive placement for their child, the tribe must be notified and may step in to deny the placement chosen by the parents and place a child an in Indian home.  ICWA lays out specific placement preferences. “In any adoptive placement of an Indian child under State law, a preference shall be given, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, to a placement with (1) a member of the child’s extended family; (2) other members of the Indian child’s tribe; or (3) other Indian families.”

Even more shocking, if you were to be raped, decided to place the child for adoption, and the biological father is an enrolled Native American, the tribe can step in determine where the child is placed, including with the “father’s” family!

Do you think it’s unlikely that a tribe would ignore parents’ wishes?  You’d be wrong.  It happens in infant adoption cases, and it happens even when children are older.   The tribe has claimed children in numerous cases, several of which are high profile.  Fortunately, in many cases, appeals courts overturn the tribe’s attempts to take a child.[8] [9]  [10] [11][12] [13] [14] [15]

When SCOTUS ruled in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl that ICWA doesn’t apply to a child who was never in an “Indian family,” a non-native mother will actually, finally, be able to choose a placement for her infant child without interference from an Indian tribe.

ICWA is meant to provide special protection to Indian Children.  Instead, it places specific burdens on Indian Children. [16] Unfortunately, too many cases have shown that the tribe is more concerned with keeping its children than with keeping its children safe.[17] [18] Because of the shortage of Indian foster and adoptive homes[19] [20] [21], Indian children are often placed with known substance abusers or known sexual and physical abusers who are Native rather than a safe non-Native home.[22] [23] [24] [25] [26]

Why would the tribes place Native American children in harm’s way?  It’s chilling to realize that the courts have interpreted ICWA to mean that the best interest of an Indian child is different from the best interests of other children.  What we might think of as best interest of a child, such as a stable environment, basic necessities, and lots of love and attention, is not what ICWA means by best interest.  For example, consider the following in a case before the Montana Supreme Court.  “…(W)hile the best interests of the child is an appropriate and significant factor in custody cases under state law, it is an improper test to use in ICWA cases because the ICWA expresses the presumption that it is in an Indian child’s bestinterests to be placed in accordance with the statutory preferences.”[27]

The ruling protects adoptions, and, as a result, children

In order for domestic adoptions to be a viable course of action for giving needful children homes, it’s important that parents not be able to change their minds after a child has bonded with his or her adoptive family.  For example, one NA biological mother who voluntarily relinquished her infant for adoption attempted to regain custody two years later.[28] Even if unsuccessful, this sort of legal battle places serious financial and emotional burdens on both families and, therefore, the child.

Dusten Brown didn’t want responsibility for Veronica.  He signed away his rights.  But then, inexplicably, when she had been with her adoptive family four months, he wanted her.  Under SC law, he would have no rights because of abandonment and because he signed legal papers relinquishing his rights.  Had Brown not been a member of the Cherokee National of Oklahoma, there would have been no invocation of ICWA. Without ICWA, when he abandoned his child and signed away his rights, Veronica would have been happily adopted in SC with the Capobiancos, her birth mother, and her half-siblings, in a lovely open adoption.

Bonnie Cleaveland, PhD is a licensed clinical psychologist in private practice in Charleston, South Carolina.


Footnotes

[1] Briggs, L. (2103). Feminists and the Baby Veronica Case.  Retrieved from http://www.ncrw.org/public-forum/real-deal-blog/guest-blog-feminists-and-baby-veronica-case

[2] Hollinger, et al. Amicus Brief Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl U.S.  12-399 (February, 2013)

[3] Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. (2013)

[4] Indian Child Welfare Act,
25 U.S.C. (1978)

[5] Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 731 SE 2d 550 – SC: Supreme Court 2012

[6] (2013, June 30).  Indian child welfare laws should be for children.  The Bismarck Tribune.

[7] (2013, February 5).  Native Americans; For sake of a theory, law tears at adoptive families.  The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

[8] Adams, B. (2010, September 28). Navajo Nation can’t fight adoption of tribal kids.  The Salt Lake Tribune.  Retrieved from http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/home/50372614-76/navajo-nation-state-child.html.csp

[9] McCarty, M.  (2010, July 4). ‘Don’t take my child,’ a mother begs;

A California woman prepares for a custody battle with a Dayton man. Dayton Daily News.  Retrieved from http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/news/local/dont-take-my-child-california-mother-begs/nNFCC/

[10] Klien, G. (2009, August 15). Mother invokes Indian law in victory over Marin child welfare authorities.  Marin Independent Journal.

[11] (2008, December 16). Couple to appeal for return of Indian baby. South Jordan, UT.UPI.

[12] (2007, August 29) Children, Discrimination and the Indian Child Welfare Act. U.S. Newswire.

[13] Dvorak, T. (2005, July 6) American Indian mother frustrated by laws that let tribe block adoption. The Associated Press.

[14] Miller, J.  (2004, September 3) Applicability of Indian Child Welfare Act to private adoption explored by NYC family court.  The Daily Record of Rochester.

[15] (2013, July 15).  Whiteshield Pleads Guilty in Death of Spirit Lake Toddler.  Valleynewslive.com. Retrieved from  http://www.valleynewslive.com/story/22622418/update-lawmakers-calling-for-action-in-spirit-lake-child-death

[16] (2007, October 9). A Tribal Question;

Native American children should not be harmed by a law intended to preserve Indian families.  The Washington Post.

[17] Williams, T.  (2012, September 19).  A Tribe’s Epidemic of Child Sex Abuse, Minimized for Years.  The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/20/us/us-steps-in-as-child-sex-abuse-pervades-sioux-tribe.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

[18] Williams, T. (2012, July 7).  Officials See Child Welfare Dangers on a North Dakota Indian Reservation.  The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/08/us/child-welfare-dangers-seen-on-spirit-lake-reservation.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

[19] (2012, July 15).Race Should not be Overriding Factor; In Adoption Process, only one Cultural Identity is Key.  The Daily Oklahoman.

[20] (2012, March 28) Goveror Susana Martinez: Foster Care System Needs More Native American Foster Families.  States News Service.

[21] (2004, September 4) Indian children need foster care.  Deseret Morning News.  Retrieved from http://www.deseretnews.com/article/595089155/Indian-children-need-foster-care.html?pg=all

[22] Collinsworth, A.  (October 4, 1997). Report details child’s abuse, death.  Edmondsun.com Retrieved from http://www.edmondsun.com/local/x519222174/Report-details-child-s-abuse-death.

[23] Kelly, A. (2011, January 27). Hearing in foster child’s death yields no decision about trial.  The Oklahoman.

[24] Cunnif, M.  (2008, April 4). Toddler’s Killing by Convict Leads DSHS, Yakamas to Update Caregiver Policies.  Spokesman Review.

[25] Manson, P. and Sanchez, J.  (2008, February 20) Abused siblings now have loving home – and $1 million from feds The Salt Lake Tribune.  Retrieved from http://archive.sltrib.com/article.php?id=8310879&itype=NGPSID

[26] Clay, N. and Ellis, R.  (2007, October 4). U.S. law pushed boy home before he died; Tribe fought state’s move to cut mom’s parental rights. The Oklahoman.

[27] In re CH, 997 P. 2d 776 – Montana Supreme Court 2000.

[28] Harrelson, G. (2007, May 4). A case of two mothers.  St. Paul Pioneer Press.

656 thoughts on “INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT

  1. Pingback: cialis india
  2. Pingback: cialis coupon cvs
  3. Pingback: cialis online
  4. Pingback: Viagra medication
  5. Pingback: cialis daily cost
  6. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  7. Pingback: cialis walmart
  8. Pingback: levitra online
  9. Pingback: cheap viagra
  10. Pingback: viagra for sale
  11. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  12. Pingback: cialis vs viagra
  13. Pingback: ed drugs
  14. Pingback: ed pills online
  15. Pingback: tadalafil 20 mg
  16. Pingback: buy viagra
  17. Pingback: canadian pharmacy
  18. Pingback: cialis mastercard
  19. Pingback: cialis online
  20. Pingback: vardenafil pill
  21. Pingback: vardenafil pill
  22. Pingback: casino slots
  23. Pingback: casinos
  24. Pingback: short term loans
  25. Pingback: loan online
  26. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  27. Pingback: cialis 5 mg
  28. Pingback: slot machines
  29. Pingback: cialis to buy
  30. Pingback: generic cialis
  31. Pingback: cialis buy
  32. Pingback: cialis internet
  33. Pingback: online gambling
  34. Pingback: casino real money
  35. Pingback: casinos
  36. Pingback: viagra reviews
  37. Pingback: viagra alternative
  38. Pingback: when to buy viagra
  39. Pingback: generic viagra
  40. Pingback: cialis tadalafil
  41. Pingback: buy viagra cheap
  42. Pingback: buy viagra pills
  43. Pingback: buy line viagra
  44. Pingback: Viagra 200mg usa
  45. Pingback: cialis coupons
  46. Pingback: buy viagra
  47. Pingback: Cialis 20mg uk
  48. Pingback: Cialis 80 mg cheap
  49. Pingback: viagra pills
  50. Pingback: viagra for sale
  51. Pingback: Cialis 10mg nz
  52. Pingback: Cialis 20 mg uk
  53. Pingback: generic cialis
  54. Pingback: buy viagra
  55. Pingback: viagra for sale
  56. Pingback: amaryl 1 mg prices
  57. Pingback: antivert 25 mg usa
  58. Pingback: arava 10 mg otc
  59. Pingback: viagra coupons
  60. Pingback: arimidex 1 mg uk
  61. Pingback: avapro 150mg uk
  62. Pingback: sildenafil
  63. Pingback: cialis ontario
  64. Pingback: cost of buspar 5mg
  65. Pingback: viagra for women
  66. Pingback: viagra 100mg
  67. Pingback: casodex 50mg price
  68. Pingback: ceclor 250 mg uk
  69. Pingback: celebrex tablets
  70. Pingback: celexa purchase
  71. Pingback: cost of cephalexin
  72. Pingback: claritin cheap
  73. Pingback: real money casino
  74. Pingback: online gambling
  75. Pingback: hollywood casino
  76. Pingback: rivers casino
  77. Pingback: best car insurance
  78. Pingback: carinsurance
  79. Pingback: buy cialis canada
  80. Pingback: buy cialis brand
  81. Pingback: viagra mg dosage
  82. Pingback: payday quick loans
  83. Pingback: check into cash
  84. Pingback: buy cbd oil online
  85. Pingback: hempworks cbd oil
  86. Pingback: cbd pills sale
  87. Pingback: money order viagra
  88. Pingback: Female viagra
  89. Pingback: ace homework
  90. Pingback: write essay
  91. Pingback: mail order cialis
  92. Pingback: clozaril 100 mg nz
  93. Pingback: Buy viagra canada
  94. Pingback: combivent pharmacy
  95. Pingback: coreg uk
  96. Pingback: generic cialis
  97. Pingback: editing thesis
  98. Pingback: essayhelpbgs.com
  99. Pingback: ddavp coupon
  100. Pingback: differin pharmacy
  101. Pingback: Price viagra
  102. Pingback: doxycycline tablet
  103. Pingback: cheap geodon 20mg
  104. Pingback: imdur online
  105. Pingback: cialis
  106. Pingback: cialis for sale
  107. Pingback: buy imodium
  108. Pingback: company website
  109. Pingback: viagra vs cialis
  110. Pingback: viagra generic
  111. Pingback: indocin prices
  112. Pingback: levaquin 500 mg uk
  113. Pingback: macrobid canada
  114. Pingback: Amaryl
  115. Pingback: people's pharmacy
  116. Pingback: mobic prices
  117. Pingback: Toradol
  118. Pingback: periactin pills
  119. Pingback: phenergan otc
  120. Pingback: plaquenil for sale
  121. Pingback: prilosec 20 mg usa
  122. Pingback: procardia generic
  123. Pingback: provigil 200 mg uk
  124. Pingback: reglan tablets
  125. Pingback: remeron canada
  126. Pingback: risperdal price
  127. Pingback: cheapest rogaine
  128. Pingback: singulair price
  129. Pingback: tenormin cost
  130. Pingback: order valtrex
  131. Pingback: verapamil coupon
  132. Pingback: buy cialis pill
  133. Pingback: zyprexa 5mg prices
  134. Pingback: zyvox 600mg uk
  135. Pingback: sildenafil cost
  136. Pingback: tadalafil cheap
  137. Pingback: cheap escitalopram
  138. Pingback: fexofenadine uk
  139. Pingback: glimepiride cost
  140. Pingback: atomoxetine prices
  141. Pingback: clonidine nz
  142. Pingback: cialis great price
  143. Pingback: clozapine pharmacy
  144. Pingback: doxycycline pills
  145. Pingback: cialis for women
  146. Pingback: inydaotl
  147. Pingback: etodolac pills
  148. Pingback: bydxgnzx
  149. Pingback: buy cialis
  150. Pingback: buy viagra
  151. Pingback: safe buy cialis
  152. Pingback: comprar viagra
  153. Pingback: write my essay
  154. Pingback: lasix tablet price
  155. Pingback: generic ivermectin
  156. Pingback: ventolin 2.5 mg
  157. Pingback: gemfibrozil online
  158. Pingback: dapoxetine analog
  159. Pingback: diflucan and xanax
  160. Pingback: thesis abstracts
  161. Pingback: female propecia
  162. Pingback: cialis sample pack
  163. Pingback: Tem Oto Çekici
  164. Pingback: otc metformin
  165. Pingback: tadalafil pharmacy
  166. Pingback: Nemasole
  167. Pingback: pharmacy intern
  168. Pingback: Zakhar Berkut hd
  169. Pingback: 4569987
  170. Pingback: cialis drug plan
  171. Pingback: buy in miami
  172. Pingback: news news news
  173. Pingback: buy philippines
  174. Pingback: psy
  175. Pingback: psy2022
  176. Pingback: projectio-freid
  177. Pingback: kinoteatrzarya.ru
  178. Pingback: topvideos
  179. Pingback: video
  180. Pingback: 20mg for sale
  181. Pingback: 20mg for sale
  182. Pingback: lovooeinloggen.com
  183. Pingback: Ukrainskie-serialy
  184. Pingback: site
  185. Pingback: top
  186. Pingback: viagra or cialis
  187. Pingback: bumble dating site
  188. Pingback: Dating online
  189. Pingback: zendaya dating
  190. Pingback: cytotmeds.com
  191. Pingback: podolsk-region.ru
  192. Pingback: keto diet plan pdf
  193. Pingback: dapoxetine otc
  194. Pingback: silumanseo
  195. Pingback: good pharmacy
  196. Pingback: regcialist.com
  197. Pingback: stromectol tired
  198. Pingback: norvasc price
  199. Pingback: snorting lyrica
  200. Pingback: lexapro alcohol
  201. Pingback: purchase viagra
  202. Pingback: herbal viagra
  203. Pingback: reddit lexapro
  204. Pingback: cialis for men
  205. Pingback: buy cialis pills
  206. Pingback: sildenafil coupon
  207. Pingback: viagra cheap
  208. Pingback: buy cialis uk
  209. Pingback: viagra prices
  210. Pingback: 1
  211. Pingback: overnight cialis
  212. Pingback: prednisone nz
  213. Pingback: viagra script
  214. Pingback: ivermectin cvs
  215. Pingback: ivermectin 300 mg
  216. Pingback: cialis free trial
  217. Pingback: ztm 500 pfizer
  218. Pingback: salbutamol 250
  219. Pingback: ivermectin trial
  220. Pingback: z pack anxiety
  221. Pingback: buy sildenafil
  222. Pingback: dapoxetine delhi
  223. Pingback: viagra dosages
  224. Pingback: amoxil 500mg
  225. Pingback: furosemide cost us
  226. Pingback: plaquenil coupon
  227. Pingback: viagra sildenafil
  228. Pingback: priligy price
  229. Pingback: ivermectin canada
  230. Pingback: zithromax pfizer
  231. Pingback: lasix 20 mg price
  232. Pingback: viagra generico
  233. Pingback: gabapentin 500
  234. Pingback: quineprox 30
  235. Pingback: viagra boys
  236. Pingback: prednisone brand
  237. Pingback: viagra tablets

Leave a Reply